PhilArchive
open access
Auburn Governance Report Independent Verification of the Permanent Axiom Trust Boundary
This report documents an independent verification exercise on the Permanent Axiom trust boundary of a machine-verified Coq formalisation in the analysis of partial differential equations. The underlying formalisation consists of three independent Coq files for subcritical energy estimates of 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes on the periodic torus, verified by the Coq kernel with zero Admitted statements. The question the report addresses is narrower and more methodological than the mathematics itself: when a formal proof is accepted by the kernel, what remains to be verified by a human auditor, and how should that residual verification work be structured? The report's methodological contribution is an explicit taxonomy of the hypothesis-to-axiom pipeline in AI-assisted formal mathematics. Every Hypothesis introduced in the formalisation is classified as either (a) discharged by a corresponding Lemma whose statement is literally identical, or (b) declared as a Permanent Axiom with a documented classical reference, with no third category permitted. The trust boundary is the set of Permanent Axioms — seventeen in total — each of which is cited to a published classical result, and each of which is preserved in the audit history rather than silently inlined into the proof chain. The report argues that this explicit classification is the minimum honest standard for any independent-researcher formal verification project, and that the alternative — quietly accepting hypotheses without distinguishing between proved and axiomatised ones — produces a formalisation whose trust structure is unreadable. The report is offered as a contribution to the philosophy of mathematical practice and to the methodology of AI-assisted formal verification. The author is a historian by training. The report accompanies a full Figshare deposit containing the Coq files, the manuscript, and supporting documents, and is part of the broader FIELDS Protocol for AI-assisted machine-checked mathematics.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Regime Compression and Scientific Discovery: How Bounded Inquiry Turns Accumulated Constraint into New Explanatory Structure#695622
- FORGE: A Structural Branch Analysis Method for Complex Systems#107511
- Certified Export Without a Global Hypersurface: World-Tube Boundaries, Record Fluxes, and Covariant Export Accounting#692415
- Engineering Induced Coherence Weights for Coherence Information Theory#111435
- Deception as Computational Drag: Why False-State Coordination Becomes Structurally Expensive Over Time#693145
Record · ID 704834
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive