PhilArchive
open access
Why can’t we see this controversy? Bruno Latour, Greek myths, local alternatives
This paper proposes (once again) that a controversy has been omitted from Robert Graves’s account of how the Greek myths became an established part of the British education system. I address a question from the secondary literature on Bruno Latour: why can’t we see this controversy? Two reasons are speculatively identified.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Literature as a vehicle for Ethical and Educational Transformation in Camillus Uka’s When the Wind Blows#688091
- Changing strategies of persuasion in political rhetoric: a corpus-based critical analysis of UK government discourse 1972 to 2005.#1039655
- Philosophy of Education#760096
- The Pedagogy of Education Policy Formulation: Working from Policy Assets#460596
- Clarifying and Reframing the Neoliberal Critique of Educational Policy Using Policy Process Theories#460434
Record · ID 705164
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive