Analyzability in Human Sciences via Reproducibility and Shareability — A Theoretical Framework Based on the Clarification of Pre-Judgment Structure—

Traditional frameworks have explained misunderstandings and conflicts between individuals in terms of emotions, value differences, or ability gaps. This paper argues that their source lies in a structure that precedes such factors. It identifies the problem in the premise stage, where discrepancies in vocabulary meaning, scope, and application render discussion and judgment unshareable. The paper therefore redefines the “pre-judgment structure” as the primary object of analysis and presents a framework that formalizes vocabulary definitions, premise structures, and information selection conditions under reproducibility and examinability. Within this framework, subjectivity is operationalized as attribution of judgment, and objectivity as reproducibility and examinability, demonstrating that analyzability can be established in the human sciences by focusing on pre-judgment structure rather than evaluative conclusions.