PhilArchive
open access
Broadening Our View of Beasts: Mary Midgley on Myopia, Myths, and Why Animals Matter
In the philosophical work of Mary Midgley, one defining theme is a careful and steadfast resistance to varieties of myopic thinking: problematically partial ways of perceiving, thinking about, and understanding the world. I argue that active resistance to myopic thinking reveals a unity and continuity to most, if not all, of her concerns, projects, and interventions. This claim is defended by exploring Midgley’s active anti-myopia as it manifests in her various contributions to philosophical discussions of the ethics and epistemology of animal life.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Post epistemic injustice: are Madonna’s “brains” actually like Bernard Williams’ brains?#89244
- Our Toil Respite Only: Woolf, Diamond and the Difficulty of Reality#778977
- Origins of Self#702964
- Beyond Essence: Ontological Instability as the Foundational Axiom for Post-Essentialist Metaphysics (Presentation)#707064
- The Wonder of Wonders – Subjectivity as Non-Duality#698763
Record · ID 705554
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive