PhilArchive
open access
Science in the Age of Algorithmic Chrysopoeia?
This commentary analyzes different past approaches to scientific evaluation frameworks given algorithmic superintelligence claims and discusses guidelines for more rigorous solutions avoiding overhasty and damaging epistemic self-sabotage tendencies. Effects of spreading the misconceived idea of the epistemic perpetuum mobile are elucidated.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice#91896
- The Epistemological Dilemma of Algorithmic Justice: What is Lost When Law Becomes ‘Computable’?#376528
- Enslaving the Algorithm: From a “Right to an Explanation” to a “Right to Better Decisions”?#461993
- Proceed with Caution#778924
- Epistemic Programming: What Is It and Why Study It?#689154
Record · ID 705713
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive