Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Cognitive Stable States as the Ontogenetic Foundation of Causal Explanation: With a Commentary on Salmon’s Blue Chalk Counterexample

Chen, Lijun · 2026
PhilArchive · Papers · 2026
Open Source ↗
philosophy
Why do different attributes carry unequal explanatory weights in causal explanation? Although both momentum and colour comply with conserved-quantity transmission in physical interactions, momentum is universally recognized as a core causal factor, whereas colour is dismissed as a trivial epiphenomenon. This long-standing puzzle, formalized as Salmon’s blue chalk counterexample, has perplexed the philosophy of science for nearly three decades. This paper argues that the persistent paradox arises not from inherent defects in existing causal mechanism theories, but from cross-level cognitive misalignment. Treating human cognition as a resource-bounded information compression process, we identify four naturally emergent discrete cognitive stable states: Primordial Percept (L1), Symbolic Percept (L2), Formalised Percept (L3), and Algorithmic Percept (L4). We demonstrate that Salmon attempted to resolve an L1-originated ontogenetic puzzle through L3–L4 formal and algorithmic tools. The primitive bias for explanatory relevance stems from evolutionary embodied filtering, rather than physical conservation rules or statistical correlation. We further formulate six fundamental relations between cognitive stable states: Compression (P1), Generation (P2), Realisation (P3), Dependence (P4), Emergence (P5), and Rollback (P6). Compression and rollback form the complementary dual wings of cognitive dynamics. As an intrinsic compensatory mechanism for unavoidable information loss in compression, cognitive rollback dismantles rigid stable configurations and restores cognitive freedom, rather than merely reversing compression. Together, the six propositions construct a unified ontogenetic framework of cognition, which fundamentally grounds the theory of causal explanation. Furthermore, this framework demarcates the structural boundaries and upper capacity limits of artificial causal reasoning in AI systems.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 705880
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive