PhilArchive
open access
Continuous, Quantified, quantity as Knowledge? issue 20240201
The knowing subject does not think nature, he is thought of nature and of himself, not of a world which would be other to him but of a world of which he is the meaning. This meaning emerges by separation of his own individuation into participating singularities. Then the question, on the epistemic level, is how the fundamental concepts of mathematics and physics emerge, including the One, the quantified, the continuous, the more and the less etc.. what relationship is there between the (objectified) meaning of these concepts and their real nature in the subject?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Epistemic Limits and the Manufactured Subject: A Theoretical Investigation into the Hidden Structures Preceding and Shaping Knowledge#724350
- Six Theses relating to the Philosophy of Science in Biology#108442
- Roy Bhaskar on Scientific Progress and the Fallibility of Cognition: A Critique of Four Approaches#761305
- Quantum Pedagogy, _Democritus' Schemata_#705552
- Knowledge and disagreement#229691
Record · ID 706547
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive