State-Sanctioned Academic Sippenhaft: Are All State-Assigned White Children and Adults Racists Without Due Process per the State Ivory Tower?

This paper demonstrates that the current policy of a state’s assignment of race to an infant at birth in the United States, when operationalized by a state-backed academic institution or actor, constitutes a Nazi-era doctrine of Sippenhaft. When any state in U.S. government assigns a predefined state-race-category (SRC) to all infants, children, or adult human beings after they are born or arrive to their jurisdiction, and any state or accredited academic institution and/or academic bigot actor constructs, operationalizes, and instrumentalizes (publishes) any content with state-backed authoritative and permanent pejorative-academic-racial-slur such as SRC-supremist, SRC-oppressor, or SRC-racist et al without any possibility of due process in the human being’s lifetime. The Constitutional curiosity is that both the race classification and the state-conviction of racist collapses individual due process thus creating a structural doctrine of illegal Sippenhaft-adjacent state-authored group social defect or state conviction with no legal due process. Thus in direct violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments this creates unlimited liability for the state, from the educational institution and state Sippenhaft-adjacent-education academics/scientists. The 1st Amendment protections of the academic or institution is negated, as the academic’s action is not that of a private citizen, but an agent of the state-educational, or state/federal non-profit educational system. One sociology paper is analyzed resulting posterior probability P (H — D) ¿ 0.95 suggests beyond reasonable legal-scientific doubt that the labeling system of Chen et al assigns negative judgment to SRC-431 relative to others with state-backed authority, otherwise known as prime-face racial discrimination of a state-employed academic actor under the color of education. As additional proof, an asymmetry Test via Term Substitution for one historical religious breed caste of the author's ancestry was relaced instead of the assumption that SRC-431 Race code was ”racist by default” and interestingly the first author's race was the racist.