PhilArchive
open access
Malice and the Ridiculous as Self-ignorance: A Dialectical Argument in Philebus 47d-50e
In the Philebus, Socrates constructs a dialectical argument in which he purports to explain to Protarchus why the pleasure that spectators feel when watching comedy is a mixture of pleasure and pain. To do this he brings in phthonos (malice or envy) as his prime example (47d-50e). I examine the argument and claim that Socrates implicitly challenges Protarchus’ beliefs about himself as moderate and self-knowing. I discuss two reasons to think that more is at stake in the argument than the mixed pleasure and pain of comic malice.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Being and Becoming Good in Plato's _Protagoras_#73126
- A Story of Corruption: False Pleasure and the Methodological Critique of Hedonism in Plato’s _Philebus_#726427
- Poetry and Hedonic Error in Plato’s Republic#767364
- Ancient Attention and Modern Flow Revisiting Prosochē through Contemporary Lenses#109737
- Natural and Divine Orders: The Politics of Sophocles' Philoctetes#721113
Record · ID 707665
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive