PhilArchive
open access
Should damage to the machinery for social perception damage perception
We argue that Graziano and Kastner are mistaken to claim that neglect favors their self-directed social perception account of consciousness. For the latter should not predict that neglect would result from damage to mechanisms of social perception. Neglect is better explained in terms of damage to attentional mechanisms.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Being Perceived and Being “Seen”: Interpersonal Affordances, Agency, and Selfhood#702748
- Change Blindness and Inattentional Blindness#165369
- On the evolution of conscious attention#738600
- Social and cognitive underpinnings of collective emotion#684949
- Sequential neural dynamics underlie unconscious integration and conscious perception of visual stimuli.#368274
Record · ID 708245
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive