PhilArchive
open access
Could the World be Flat?
Flatworldism denies that there are hierarchical relationships of ontological priority between things: a coffee cup is no less fundamental than the particles that make it up, and a corporation is no less fundamental than its employees. In this discussion of Marc Fiocco's Time and World, I entertain several versions of flatworldism, including Fiocco's own version. After drawing connections between flatworldism and ontological pluralism, I suggest that some versions of flatworldism, including ontological pluralism and ontological nihilism, fare better with respect to explanatory power than Fiocco's formulation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Working through our differences: limits of ontology in the ordinary lives of critical geographical theory#217995
- The unbearable circularity of easy ontology#762174
- The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context#119277
- Essence and Concept_English Version#94218
- Foundational Ontologies: From Theory to Practice and Back#744252
Record · ID 708543
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive