PhilArchive
open access
Must an Appearance of Succession Involve a Succession of Appearances?
It is argued that a subject who has an experience as of succession can have this experience at a time, or over a period of time, during which there occurs in him no succession of conscious mental states at all. Various metaphysical implications of this conclusion are explored. One premise of the main argument is that every experience is an experience as of succession. This implies that we cannot understand phenomenal temporality as a relation among experiences, but only as a primitive feature of experience, or else as something analyzable into wholly non-phenomenal terms.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ”A succession of feelings, in and of itself, is not a feeling of succession’#740287
- The Appearance Interface: A Formal Framework for the Transition from Classical Records to Lived Experience#111418
- Emerging Dimensionality: The Present as Unfolding from Lower-Dimensional Reality#108233
- Original Insight: Neuroscience vs. CSFT Interpretation#728273
- The Interior of the Universe#101920
Record · ID 708938
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive