PhilArchive
open access
The ignoring of Raymond Tallis on literary theory and the SYSTEMS THEORY of gender differences
Why was Raymond Tallis’s book Not Saussure largely ignored by literary critics? Here I present one response to this question: he does not offer a novel alternative system for literary interpretation. And I consider whether the situation is any different in other fields, introducing a rival to Simon Baron-Cohen’s empathizing-systematizing theory of gender differences when doing so.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Popular nonfiction can durably shift politically relevant attitudes—and so can a much shorter AI summary#976844
- Popular nonfiction can durably shift politically relevant attitudes—and so can a much shorter AI summary#976683
- Schellenberg on Propositional Faith#740832
- The impact of reading devices on affective and cognitive responses to fiction and non-fiction reading#445854
- Fictional Persuasion and the Nature of Belief#770697
Record · ID 708978
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive