PhilArchive
open access
God? An Argument From Reason and Its Indication; Function, Potentiality and Revelation
This paper argues that it is more reasonable to assume a thinking creator than any alternative. Part I uses the scientific method to show that identification of function requires intelligence, and that the universe contains identifiable, utilizable function thus implying an intelligent origin. Part II argues that potentiality is the necessary constant underlying all actuality, and that the object of potentiality, taken as a whole, has the ability to think and will thus implying a singular necessary being. Part III applies these derived characteristics to major religious traditions, showing that under the conditional assumption of revelation, Christianity most coherently exhibits such characteristics of the object of potentiality.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Necessity of an Incarnate Prophet#96944
- ISUN : Theological Philosophy ; The Undeniable System and the Human Need to Believe#693090
- On a Thomistic Worry about Scotus's Doctrine of the Esse Christi#737256
- Evolution and the Bible: The Hermeneutical Question#717536
- Kant's Arguments for God's Existence#746567
Record · ID 709685
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive