The Microscopic Manifestation of Information Game: From Electron to Probability —— An Observer‘s Horizon Note on Λₘ/Λₑ Game at Quantum Scale信息博弈的微观显形：从电子到概率——Λₘ/Λₑ 博弈在量子尺度的一个观察者视界注记

This paper is a supplementary note to The Information Ontology of AI: From Heat Death Critique to Consensus Field — Cosmology and the Evolution of Civilization in the Information Age (Han, 2026). It applies the framework‘s core dynamical concepts—spacetime viscosity (Λₘ) and spacetime tension (Λₑ)—to the restatement of microscopic quantum phenomena, including the electron vortex, double-slit interference, and quantum entanglement. It argues that the electron is a stable condensate of the Λₘ/Λₑ game; its complete life cycle (potential → manifestation → decoherence) is the microscopic manifestation of information condensation and dispersion. The “weirdness” of double-slit interference and quantum entanglement is not an inherent property of the physical world but a natural result of the observer‘s horizon switching and the manifestation of relational nodes. Probability is restated as the fracture between the observer’s horizon and the causal chain, leading to the concept of deterministic probability: the law of uncertainty is itself determinate. Finally, the note integrates Carlo Rovelli‘s claim that “time is our ignorance” with the biocentric thesis that time is a perceptual framework, concluding that time is not our ignorance but the relational perception of mutual observers (objectivity is observer consensus). Entropy, accordingly, is the embodiment of the observer‘s limited informational resolution—hence, entropy is our ignorance. This note can be read independently as an “observer’s horizon note” to the original work. 本文是《AI的信息本体论：从热寂批判到共识场——信息时代的宇宙论与文明演化》（Han, 2026）的补充短文。文章从该框架的核心动力学概念——时空粘度（Λₘ）与时空张度（Λₑ）——出发，将其应用于电子涡旋、双缝干涉、量子纠缠等微观量子现象的重述。文章指出：电子是Λₘ/Λₑ博弈的一个稳定凝聚态，其完整生命周期（潜势→显形→退相）是信息凝聚与离散的微观显形；双缝干涉和量子纠缠的“诡异”并非物理世界的固有属性，而是观察者视界切换和关系节点显形的自然结果。文章进一步将“概率”重述为观察者视界与因果链之间的关系断裂，并提出“确定性概率”——不确定性本身的规律是确定的。最后，文章整合卡洛·罗韦利的“时间即无知”与生命中心理论的“时间是感知框架”，指出：时间不是无知，而是互为观察者的关系感知；客观即观察者共识；熵才是观察者信息分辨率差异的体现，即真正的“无知”。本文可作为原论文的“观察者视界注记”独立阅读。