PhilArchive
open access
Euthyphro’s "Dilemma", Socrates’ Daimonion and Plato’s God
In this paper I start with the familiar accusation that divine command ethics faces a "Euthyphro dilemma". By looking at what Plato’s ’Euthyphro’ actually says, I argue that no such argument against divine-command ethics was Plato’s intention, and that, in any case, no such argument is cogent. I then explore the place of divine commands and inspiration in Plato’s thought more generally, arguing that Plato sees an important epistemic and practical role for both.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Maitzen’s Objection from God’s Goodness#75314
- Seeking God’s help is rational since the human condition is desperate#709297
- The _Phaedo_'s Final Argument and the Soul's Kinship with the Divine#114308
- Review of POLITIS, V., _Plato’s Essentialism: Reinterpreting the Theory of Forms_ (Cambridge University Press, 2021)#700373
- Reason and Value in Plato#741714
Record · ID 710212
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive