PhilArchive
open access
Review of On Psychological and Visionary Art: Notes from C G Jung’s Lecture Gérard de Nerval’s ‘Aurélia’
Susan Neiman pointed out to this reviewer the danger that Carl Jung studies pose to contemporary scholars. It is keeping in mind Neiman's cautionary advice that this review establishes Jung's contributions to Romanticism. "[Craig] Stephenson’s analysis of Aurélia has now superseded Arthur Lovejoy’s (1873–1962) and Mario Praz’s (1896–1982) contributions to the definitions of Romanticism."
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- JUNG, C. G., y ANIELA JAFFÉ. Jung’s Life and Work: Interviews for Memories, Dreams, Reflections with Aniela Jaffé. Ed. Sonu Shamdasani. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2025.#183430
- The End Of Art Revisited: A Response To Kalle Puolakka#750346
- A Personalist Aspect of Saint Anselm’s Platonist Metaphysics#104999
- The Healing Potential of Art: A Psychobiographical Study of Three Artists#1147679
- Formação (Bildung), educação e experimentação: sobre as tipologias pedagógicas em Nietzsche#776586
Record · ID 710382
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive