PhilArchive
open access
Review of Paul Ricoeur's Evil: A Challenge to Philosophy and Theology
This review shows how Pierre Gisel's comments on Ricoeur are redundant; how Graham Ward gets Ricoeur's understanding of evil clearly; but then it goes on to show how both Gisel and Ward do not understand/mention the influence of St. Paul and Jürgen Moltmann on Ricoeur.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Discussion of Evil in Christianity#710440
- Orthodoxy and Culture, Tradition and Ro manian Spirit over the Centuries. Apologetics Ideas in the Thought of Dmitri Cantemir#74826
- Autor, dzieło i czytelnik w świetle potrójnej mimesis Paula Ricoeura#743840
- The Patristic Method of Biblical Interpretation#118770
- Dante on the Evil of Treachery—Narrative and Philosophy#70915
Record · ID 710383
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive