PhilArchive
open access
Attribution of concepts and problems with anachronism
ABSTRACTMany long‐standing debates about anachronistic concept‐attributions derive from an essentialist understanding of concepts that is often difficult to sustain for metaphysical or epistemological reasons. The intentionalist alternative to essentialism elaborated in this article successfully clarifies and avoids many standard problems with anachronism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Heidegger's Philosophical Endeavor: A Journey through Plato, Comparative Thought, and Indic Contemplation#80916
- Scientific essentialism in the light of classification practice in biology – a case study of phytosociology.#746539
- Zenodo Anti-Enlightenment Project#726079
- Veritism refuted? Understanding, idealization, and the facts#756406
- Distinguishing WV Quine and Donald Davidson#99082
Record · ID 710751
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive