PhilArchive
open access
Paternalism and Duties to Self
Here I pursue two main aims: (1) to articulate and defend a Kantian conception of duties to self, and (2) to explore the ramifications of such duties for the moral justification of paternalism. I conclude that there is a distinctive reason to resent paternalistic intercessions aimed at assisting others in fulfilling their duties to self (or the self-regarding virtues necessary thereunto), based on the fact that the goods realized via their fulfillment are historical, i.e., their value depends on an individual's casual contribution to their fulfillment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Duties to Self, Consent, and Respect in Kant’s Moral Philosophy#708535
- Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection#734465
- The Duty of Knowing Oneself as One Appears: A Response to Kant’s Problem of Moral Self-Knowledge#762261
- Dignity and Respect: How to Apply Kant's Formula of Humanity#734431
- Kant and Moral of the Story: Moral Duty Against the Individual Account and Obedience to the Self#74080
Record · ID 710850
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive