PhilArchive
open access
Neuroeconomics and Confirmation Theory
Neuroeconomics is a research programme founded on the thesis that cognitive and neurobiological data constitute evidence for answering economic questions. I employ confirmation theory in order to reject arguments both for and against neuroeconomics. I also emphasize that some arguments for neuroeconomics will not convince the skeptics because these arguments make a contentious assumption: economics aims for predictions and deep explanations of choices in general. I then argue for neuroeconomics by appealing to a much more restrictive (and thereby skeptic-friendly) characterization of the aims of economics.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mentalism versus Behaviourism in Economics: A Philosophy-of-Science Perspective#748758
- Free Will & Empirical Arguments for Epiphenomenalism#727474
- Are Our Current Rational Decision-Making Models Truly Rational? A Critical Analysis and a New Neurobiological Framework#687819
- Conjectures and Reputations:The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and the History of Economic Thought#738761
- Prolegomena of the Evolutionary Rational Epistemology#709336
Record · ID 711224
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive