PhilArchive
open access
Finding, Clarifying, and Evaluating Arguments
This document is designed as a resource for undergraduate students in introductory-level philosophy courses. It provides explanations and techniques for identifying arguments in prose passages, understanding them, and evaluating the quality of their reasoning. Some of the common topics covered include conditional statements, validity and soundness, the counterexample method, and common argument forms.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Parser evaluation using textual entailments#954738
- Considering the roles of values in practical reasoning argumentation evaluation#698622
- Mining Arguments From 19th Century Philosophical Texts Using Topic Based Modelling#747515
- Ability-based objections to no-best-world arguments#744737
- A Guide to Good Reasoning: Cultivating Intellectual Virtues, 2nd ed. by David Carl Wilson#102336
Record · ID 711386
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive