PhilArchive
open access
The Natural Foundations of Religion
In the Natural history of religion, Hume attempts to understand the origin of our folk belief in gods and spirits. These investigations are not, however, purely descriptive. Hume demonstrates that ontological commitment to supernatural agents depends on motivated reasoning and illusions of control. These beliefs cannot, then, be reflectively endorsed. This proposal must be taken seriously because it receives support from recent work on our psychological responses to uncertainty. It also compares quite favorably with its main competitors in the cognitive science of religion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dawkins’s Gambit, Hume’s Aroma, and God’s Simplicity#777111
- Hume's Philosophy of Belief: Is Religious Belief Natural Belief?#696835
- The Normativity of Experience and Causal Belief in Hume’s _Treatise_#697326
- Empirical Evidence Regarding the Folk Psychological Concept of Belief#739867
- A Match Made in (Rational) Heaven? How Credences Relate to Probability Beliefs#77813
Record · ID 711636
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive