PhilArchive
open access
Do Machines Have Prima Facie Duties?
A properly programmed artificially intelligent agent may eventually have one duty, the duty to satisfice expected welfare. We explain this claim and defend it against objections.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation#269878
- Supply Chains, Work Alternatives, and Autonomous Vehicles#84121
- DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE#299576
- What is it for a Life to go Well (or Badly)?: Some Critical Comment of Waynes Sumner's Theory of Welfare#760376
- Machine Law, Ethics, and Morality in the Age of Artificial Intelligence#964392
Record · ID 711661
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive