PhilArchive
open access
What Do We Need to Know to Know that Animals are Conscious of What They Know?
In this paper I argue for the following six claims: 1) The problem is that some think metacognition and consciousness are dissociable. 2) The solution is not to revive associationist explanations; 3) …nor is the solution to identify metacognition with Carruthers’ gatekeeping mechanism. 4) The solution is to define conscious metacognition; 5) … devise an empirical test for it in humans; and 6) … apply it to animals.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Getting It Together: Psychological Unity and Deflationary Accounts of Animal Metacognition#711670
- The Blue Pen Collapse: How to Detect Cognition Without Human Bias#76301
- Explaining Perception: An Assessment of Current Ecological and Cognitivist Approaches#118530
- Consciousness doesn't do that#105453
- ¿Metacognición en los animales? Los argumentos de Carruthers en contra de los test metacognitivos.#114540
Record · ID 711692
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive