PhilArchive
open access
Vague comparisons
Some comparisons are hard. How should we think about such comparisons? According to John Broome, we should think about them in terms of vagueness. But the vagueness account has remained unpopular thus far. Here I try to bolster it by clarifying the notion of comparative vagueness that lies at its heart.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Paths Through the Fog: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Philosophical Logics for Vagueness#93837
- What makes for conceptual similarity?#76573
- Necessarily Maybe. Quantifiers, Modality and Vagueness#75421
- Higher Order Vagueness#760893
- The Fuzzy Brain. Vagueness and Mapping Connectivity in the Human Cerebral Cortex#739276
Record · ID 711914
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive