PhilArchive
open access
Freeing Mysticism: Epistemic standards in theory and practice
With the growth of epistemology, an important debate in philosophy of religion has arisen: can mystical encounters—purported feelings of intense unity with the divine—serve as epistemic warrants? In this paper, I examine two of the most prominent and promising standards by which to determine the veridicality of such encounters—those of William Alston and Richard Swinburne—and demonstrate their respective strengths and shortcomings. Considering these shortcomings, I compose and defend my own set of criteria to use in evaluating the veridicality of putative mystical experiences which draws upon the subject’s religious tradition, rationality, and affectivity.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Studies in Mysticism and Mystical Experience in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia#750700
- The Multiple Realities of Paul’s Mystical Experience: A Phenomenological Perspective in the Anthropology of Religion#17507
- Mystical Experience in Hypnosis: a Neurophenomenological Study#868274
- Das große Missverständnis. Kierkegaard, das Christentum und die Mystik#764472
- Rethinking Religious Epistemology#97725
Record · ID 711931
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive