PhilArchive
open access
Attention, Perception, and Thought in Aristotle
In the first part of the paper, I’ll rehearse an argument that perceiving that we see and hear isn’t a special case of perception in Aristotle but is rather a necessary condition for any perception whatsoever: the turning of one’s attention to the affection of the sense organs. In the second part of the paper, I’ll consider the thesis that the activity of the active intellect is analogous to perceiving that we see and hear.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Berkeley: el papel de Dios en la teoría de la visión / The Role of God in Berkeley's Theory of Vision#749444
- Attention, Gestalt Principles, and the Determinacy of Perceptual Content#776969
- Noetic Gnosis: Definition and Application#83910
- Edith Stein and the Problem of Empathy: Locating Ascription and a Structural Relation to Picture Consciousness#767729
- Arrested Attention: Essays on the Phenomenology of Love#688183
Record · ID 711991
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive