PhilArchive
open access
To Be or Not To Be a Behaviorist? Facial Recognition Systems and Critical Knowledge
In this paper, we assess the possibility of a critical knowledge of technology. In the case of facial recognition systems, 'FRS', we argue that behaviorism underlies this technology, and analyze the debate about behaviorism to show the lack of consensus about its theoretical foundations. In particular we analyze the structure of knowledge generated by FRS as affected by a technological behaviorism. Our last point is a suggestion to use the concept of dasiacritical knowledgepsila, which we borrow from Ladriere, to question and challenge the technological finalities and the foundational scientific theory underlying FRS.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Kollaborative Roboter. Universale Werkzeuge in der digitalisierten und vernetzten Arbeitswelt#657493
- Una evaluación de la fundamentación genérica de los derechos humanos digitales#103898
- Behavior#365567
- Machines for Living: Philosophy of Technology and the Photographic Image#777637
- Understanding Behaviorism#223275
Record · ID 712335
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive