Resolution Ethics III: Telic Justice — Punishment, Repair, and the Preservation of Civic Order

Resolution Ethics explains justice through the structure of authored resolution under exposure. When wrongdoing occurs, the ethical task is not to “balance suffering,” but to preserve civic order, repair standing, and maintain the conditions under which agents can resolve safely across time. This paper develops a telic model of justice: a two-horizon framework in which short-horizon responses establish public closure through mandatory prosecution, finite punishment, and restitution, while long-horizon responses govern the future through conditional supervision, risk reduction, and reintegration. Punishment is justified only insofar as it reduces systemic noise—restoring legibility, reaffirming violated norms, and preventing private enforcement—while remaining constrained by proportionality, equal application, and due process. Victim repair and state authority are treated as distinct obligations, neither of which can substitute for the other. Telic Justice therefore rejects both retributivist excess and permissive decay, offering a structured account of punishment, repair, and forgiveness as instruments for the preservation of legitimate public order.