PhilArchive
open access
Scolî medievali e tradizione antica
This paper examines the relationship between some scholia to the IIId book of Plato’s Republic, Proclus’ commentary on it, and the so-called Chrestomathia, a work that the manuscripts attribute to the Neoplatonic philosopher himself. The conclusion is that the relationship between the three texts is highly problematic, and that we cannot think of a simple and direct derivation from one another. The author of the scholia probably made use of texts different from those that have come down to us, or alternatively he has reworked his sources in a personal way.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Review of The Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages, 2 vols., edited by Christopher Schabel#740346
- Angeli et Caelum: the Birth of Polis and Cosmos in Medieval Scholastics#695726
- The Epistemic Competence of the Philosopher-Rulers in Plato's Republic#759904
- Platon, Phaidros 249BC: Über den Menschen#769527
- An Unknown Demonologist at the University of Paris? : The Opus II.7–8 by Hugh of Saint-Cher#690935
Record · ID 713128
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive