PhilArchive
open access
Classical Logic and Neutrosophic Logic. Answers to K. Georgiev
In this paper, we make distinctions between Classical Logic (where the propositions are 100% true, or 100 false) and the Neutrosophic Logic (where one deals with partially true, partially indeterminate and partially false propositions) in order to respond to K. Georgiev’s criticism [1]. We recall that if an axiom is true in a classical logic system, it is not necessarily that the axiom be valid in a modern (fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic etc.) logic system.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fuzzy, Intuitionistic and Neutrosophic Set Theories and Their Applications in Decision Analysis#719912
- The Encyclopedia of Neutrosophic Researchers. Volume IV#98094
- The Encyclopedia of Neutrosophic Researchers, 1st volume#717682
- The Encyclopedia of Neutrosophic Researchers. Volume III#110248
- The Encyclopedia of Neutrosophic Researchers. Volume I#80886
Record · ID 71389
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive