PhilArchive
open access
Leibniz on Meliorism
Leibniz claims that the actual world is the best of all possible worlds. However, this raises the question of whether there can be improvements in the world from moment to moment. This paper examines Leibniz’s view on meliorism, or progress in the best of all possible worlds. Against static, developmental, and inconsistency readings of meliorism, it is argued that a systematic progress reading should be preferred, in order to preserve Leibniz’s ethical commitments. On this view, the world increases in metaphysical, physical, and moral perfection, and this can be rendered consistent with Leibniz’s fundamental metaphysical commitments (e.g. his views on activity and passivity).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Things: The Ontological Importance of Play According to Eugen Fink#738517
- The «Grand Plan». Nature and Function of Leibniz’s Demonstrationes Catholicae#1039231
- Presumption and Leibniz’s Metaphysics of Action#85975
- Leibniz’s Horrendous and Unthinkable World: A Critique of Leibniz’s ‘Best Possible World’ Theodicy#714275
- The global/local distinction vindicates Leibniz's theodicy#699204
Record · ID 713917
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive