PhilArchive
open access
What Cannot Be False Cannot Be True
A binary mode of truth cannot express uncertainty. Knowledge not yet acquired cannot be filed as false, nor as true; so a third mode is needed. But a bare null does not work: null marks the absence of knowledge, and knowledge cannot bring itself to being by its own absence. Knowledge is either asserted bona fide or posited subjectively as phenomenon. Trust is proxy by faith; verification is direct by experience. So before verification, the posit is _untrue_, not yet false nor true, and terminally so if unfalsifiable. Bivalence holds only after a verdict. A claim that cannot fail says nothing, so what cannot be false cannot be true. Dewey seated the knower, Ramsey made belief actionable, Popper demanded it risk falsehood. Together, knowing becomes an act of verification through inquiry.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Knowledge and disagreement#229691
- Knowledge and truth: A skeptical challenge#703723
- The Nought Belief Paradox#767445
- Truthmakers, Truthbearers and the Objectivity of Truth#763806
- Counter Closure and Knowledge despite Falsehood#697786
Record · ID 714052
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive