PhilArchive
open access
God without Final Possession
This article asks how a human being can live religiously with God without turning God into an object of final possession. The question arises from a broader Evoluist insight: no finite form, theory, or system can exhaust or possess Reality as such. When applied to religious life, this means that finite forms — names, prayers, rituals, symbols, doctrines, and traditions — are necessary for address and orientation, yet become dangerous the moment they claim finality and substitute themselves for what they were meant to indicate. Drawing on the apophatic tradition and the Evoluist philosophy of registers and limits, the article reinterprets apophasis as a discipline of non-idolisation: the rigorous refusal to allow any finite form to occupy the place of God Himself. It distinguishes three registers of human engagement with reality — the scientific-explanatory register (S-register), the philosophical-conceptual register (P-register), and the existential-metaphysical register of address (M-register). God cannot be objectified in the S-register nor conceptually possessed in the P-register. Religious faith achieves its proper integrity in the M-register, where God is encountered not as something to be possessed but as One who is addressed through reverence, prayer, trust, repentance, gratitude, hope, and ultimate orientation. The article shows that revelation, dogma, and stable religious forms need not contradict apophatic discipline when they function as mediations rather than final possessions. Evoluism’s distinctive contribution is a register-sensitive articulation of apophasis within a wider philosophy of non-finalisation: just as no finite theory can possess Reality as a whole, no finite religious form can possess God. God remains God only where no finite form is allowed to become God.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From the Religious to the Mystical: The Complementarity of Methexis and Dialektikē in Platonic Philosophic Education#728890
- What is Apophaticism? Ways of Talking About an Ineffable God#766582
- Unity and Application#738678
- Skrbina's *Mind that Abides: Panpsychism in the New Millennium*#757129
- A Theological-Political Treatise [Part III]#25162
Record · ID 714116
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive