PhilArchive
open access
The Is-Ought Equivalence
This book advocates the equivalence of "is" and "ought." Some concepts describing "what something is" inherently carry normative implications of "how things ought to be." For instance: •Truth is what ought to be believed. •Beauty is what ought to be liked. •Goodness refers to other-regarding intentions that ought to be liked. •"A is the cause of B" means for B not to occur, A ought not to occur. •Value is how things ought to be preferred. •Fairness is how interests ought to be balanced.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Normativity and the Metaphysics of Mind#778713
- Ought Without Ability#102155
- Facts, Principles, and (Real) Politics#764019
- Does “Ought” Imply “Feasible”?#769591
- Ought-contextualism and reasoning#702837
Record · ID 714591
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive