PhilArchive
open access
Justice for Animals in Climate Change Integrated Assessment Models
Integrated assessment models (IAMs) exclude individual non-human animal welfare, despite clear evidence that climate change will harm billions of animals through habitat loss, extreme weather, and ecosystem disruption. We argue that this is a significant moral oversight. Further, incorporating animal welfare into IAMs is technically feasible, using traditional economic methods or novel ones. Crucially, accounting for animal welfare in IAMs need not undermine considerations of justice for humans.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Consequentialism and Climate Change#728279
- Climate Induced Migration: A Pragmatic Strategy for Wildlife Conservation on Farmland#84831
- A Phenomenological Theory of Ecological Responsibility and Its Implications for Moral Agency in Climate Change#766571
- Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 369-382 : Keynote Address: Government's Atmospheric Trust Responsibility#929055
- Climate Change, Moral Integrity, and Obligations to Reduce Individual Greenhouse Gas Emissions#739452
Record · ID 71471
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive