PhilArchive
open access
Signing on: A Contractarian Understanding of How Public History is Used for Civic Inclusion
What makes public history more than just another hill to fight over in culture war politics? In this paper I propose a novel way of understanding the political significance of how public history creates and shapes identities: a contractarian one. I argue that public history can be sensibly understood as representing groups as a society’s contracting parties. One particular value of the contractarian approach is that it helps to elucidate the phenomenon of “signing on,” where a marginalized or oppressed group is offered membership in a society without the social order being meaningfully changed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Analysis of Social Contract Theory by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke#100861
- A new Debate on an Old Question. Introductory note to 'Can the Social Contract be Signed by an Invisible Hand'#746978
- Contract, Gender, and the Emergence of the Civil-Military Distinction#89609
- Against Activist Cooperation Agreements#233257
- Fanon and the law: the misery of our time & the spirit of revolt#174045
Record · ID 714765
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive