PhilArchive
open access
Racionalita a logika_preprint
This preprint has been accepted for publication in The Philosophical Journal. Please note, this preprint has not yet undergone final checks and typesetting. The final published version of this paper may, therefore, have slightly different content. The final version will be available via the ‘Peer-reviewed Publication DOI’ link in the related External link on this webpage. Please feel free to contact the author; we welcome feedback. Thank you. The article examines the nature of rationality and its relationship to logic in the context of contemporary concerns about conspiracy theories and the limits of critical thinking. It distinguishes between practical (instrumental) and theoretical rationality and questions the view that being rational simply means following the laws of logic. While theoretical rationality is linked to logical inference, research on cognitive biases shows that human reasoning systematically departs from formal logical ideals. The paper also challenges the idea of logical laws as objective, mind-independent structures, emphasizing the plurality of logical systems and the role of language in shaping inference. Logic is thus presented not as the discovery of timeless laws, but as an idealization of inferential practices rooted in natural language.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Mismatch of Explanation and Suspicion: An Ontology of Conspiracy Theory#687534
- Teaching the Web of Rationality: A Case Study on Coherence and Conspiracy Worldviews#70780
- Dimensions of Conspiracy: An inquiry into the cognitive and epistemic standing of conspiracy theories#111615
- La realidad habla por sí sola”. Cuando exhibir fuertes convicciones no es propiamente una virtud (“Reality Speaks for Itself ”. When Exhibiting Strong Convictions is Not Properly a Virtue)#112841
- The Promise of Ideo-logic, the Psycho-Epistemic Organization of Socio-Symbolic Systems#78817
Record · ID 714836
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive