La Corrupción Dialéctica del Feminismo

This sociolinguistic and philosophical essay analyzes the transformation of conceptual frameworks (feminism, misogyny, misandry) from tools of analysis into tribal identities. It diagnoses a process of dialectical corruption whereby these terms, originally descriptive or corrective functions, become reified and banalized in contemporary discourse—especially on social media—serving as symbolic capital for identity politics rather than instruments for understanding. Key distinctions such as function vs. identity and use vs. utilization are developed to critique the instrumentalization of ideas. The work proposes the stance of the "committed non-adherent observer"—an intellectual ethic that prioritizes clarity and structural observation over tribal affiliation, resisting the symbolic coercion to choose sides. Engaging with thinkers like Bourdieu and concepts from the philosophy of language, the essay calls for a return to an honest, precise relationship with concepts, where tools for thinking are not converted into chains that bind one to a faction. [The complete essay is in Spanish.] This work is part of an expanding series of philosophical essays available and their expansions in the author's personal archive.