PhilArchive
open access
Moral Autonomy and Human Dignity: A Comparative Ethical Study of Immanuel Kant and Rabindranath Tagore
This paper undertakes a comparative ethical analysis of Immanuel Kant’s concept of moral autonomy and Rabindranath Tagore’s vision of human dignity. Kant grounds autonomy in the rational capacity of the will to legislate universal moral law, establishing dignity as intrinsic and unconditional. Tagore, by contrast, articulates an ethical humanism rooted in spiritual freedom, creative self-realization, and relational harmony. By placing these perspectives in dialogue, the study highlights convergences and divergences concerning autonomy, moral motivation, and the nature of ethical life, proposing a richer framework for contemporary intercultural ethics.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dignity and Respect: How to Apply Kant's Formula of Humanity#734431
- Kant on the Ground of Human Dignity#92311
- Guyer, Sellars and Kant on the Dignity and Value of Freedom#113807
- Two Conceptions of Kantian Autonomy#773045
- What is so special about Kant’s moral philosophy? (And why should we tell you?)#726393
Record · ID 715709
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive