PhilArchive
open access
Resolution Theory: A Unified Theory of Thresholds
This paper presents Resolution Theory as a unified theory of thresholds. Its central schema is simple: buildup is not landing. Causes are not resolution. Explanation, complexity, evidence, pressure, and formal structure may accumulate, but they do not become authorship, consciousness, knowledge, validity, or ethical standing by accumulation alone. A threshold must be crossed. The paper grounds this structure in the Exposed Cogito, moving from the first certainty of the thinking subject to not I, boundary, exposure, correction, and shared life. From this root, Resolution Theory develops accounts of ontology, epistemology, consciousness, personal identity, free will, normativity, ethics, meaning, logic, scepticism, and solipsism. The paper argues that many persistent philosophical disputes arise from confusing buildup with landing, explanation with erasure, or formal intelligibility with standing. It reframes free will as resolution under exposure, consciousness as bounded interiority, knowledge as exposure tested tracking, ethics as the minimum structure of authored life, and paradox as a diagnostic tool for discovering the rules of logic. The result is a candidate unified system in which reality, agency, knowledge, meaning, and moral life become answerable through threshold, resolution, and exposure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- System, Subsystem, Hive: boundary problems in computational theories of consciousness#732973
- Why Dennett and Chalmers are not Opponents but Complementary Thinkers#88974
- Artificial World Constitution and the Transcendental Remainder: Finite Artificial Cognition and Institutional Audit#688931
- The Boundary Discipline: Where the Lens Starts, Stops, and Applies to Itself#688607
- Closure Without Content: A Logical and Philosophical Critique of Langan’s Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe, With an Attempt at Reconstruction#705724
Record · ID 715806
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive