PhilArchive
open access
Kenneth Arrow on Rawls’s “asset egalitarian” assumption about justice
Kenneth Arrow presents Rawls as making a controversial assumption, which he terms “asset egalitarianism”: that all the assets of society, including personal skills, are available for distribution. I distinguish two versions of the assumption and draw attention to difficulties in determining what Arrow’s concern over the assumption is.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Altruism in Law and Economics#20971
- Why Pass Every Buck? On Skorupski's Buck‐Passing Account of Normativity#75742
- Social Norms and Social Practices#94725
- Rawls versus utilitarianism: the subset objection#726364
- Socratic and Cartesian Personae: Undismembering and Liquidation#728773
Record · ID 715816
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive