PhilArchive
open access
Satisficing, maximizing and bounded rationality
It is often argued that maximizing normative theories are inappropriate for bounded agents. I argue that leading motivations for theories of bounded rationality are substantially compatible with some traditional maximizing normative theories. This finding expands the audience for theories of bounded rationality by making room for advocates of maximizing normative theories, and has implications for knowledge-action principles, the relationship between descriptive and normative theorizing, and the definitions of central tenets of bounded rationality.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On the Diversity of Models in Normative Inquiry#693825
- Moral Uncertainty, Pure Justifiers, and Agent-Centred Options#693650
- Accommodating Options#747568
- The Varieties of Normativity#697753
- Preference's Progress: Rational Self-Alteration and the Rationality of Morality#750175
Record · ID 716200
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive