PhilArchive
open access
PSI Is Real (For-Nonspecialists)
This effort attempts to evaluate the claims of Daryl Bem and Dean Radin regarding psi research, in a manner that should lend itself accessible to a non-specialist, intelligent reader. Admitting the difficulties that claims of psi create in the philosophy of science, it examines in particular the work of Bem and his methodologies in light of contemporary research and its requirements. Briefly examining more than a dozen complaints about his findings, no compelling evidence was discovered that would adequately invalidate his results. Evidence from Radin from his met-analyses of psi research in conjunction with other reputable sources were included.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Psi Is Real#109122
- An Insightful Companion: Anouk Barberousse, Denis Bonnay, and Mikaël Cozic . The Philosophy of Science: A Companion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018 £64.00 HB#727170
- Significación del psicoanálisis#277958
- Análisis de los conceptos de defensa y deseo en psicoanálisis#945168
- Points of Contact in Deacon’s and Hegel’s Theories of Emergent Dynamics#704756
Record · ID 716285
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive