PhilArchive
open access
Is Happiness in the Head?
This paper examines the philosophical implications of Nozick’s thought experiment, specifically focusing on the assumption that most people would not want to be plugged into the experience machine. I present an “inverted” experience machine scenario in order to argue that this assumption is incorrect and that the scenario raises important philosophical questions about our purported unwillingness to be plugged in. The paper concludes that the “inverted” experience machine scenario is compatible with the central thesis of hedonism and other internalist theories of well-being, and provides strong support for the idea that happiness is truly in the head.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Folk Theory of Well-Being#728901
- Do the Virtues Make You Happy?#757030
- HRM system strength and employee well-being: the role of internal process and open systems#238447
- The Folk Concept of the Good Life: Neither Happiness nor Well-Being#71322
- Money And Happiness#742217
Record · ID 716433
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive