PhilArchive
open access
Multi-tasking and Cost Structure, Implications for Design
I argue that it is not possible to accurately represent our task settings as close environments with a single well defined cost structure. Natural environments are places where many things are done, often at the same time, and often by many people. To appreciate the way such invariants of everyday life affect design I present a case study, a micro-analysis of espresso making at Starbucks to show the challenges facing a cost structure approach.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Environmental Satisfaction in Open-Plan Environments: 6. Satisfaction Algorithms for Software#1111045
- Design and Responsibility: The Interdependence of Natural, Artifactual, and Human Systems#746331
- Complex influencing factors and variants of societal energy demand : quantified explorative scenarios as a tool for strategic planning / Sigrid Prehofer, Felicitas Ortlieb, Matthias Leger, Sandra Wassermann, Ulrich Fahl#623861
- Motivation to exert effort dynamically adapts to reward context and environmental controllability.#1107411
- Environmental satisfaction in open-plan environments: 1. Scale validation and methods#1111135
Record · ID 717432
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive