PhilArchive
open access
On the Puzzle of Petitionary Prayer: Response to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder
I respond to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder’s criticisms of my arguments in another place for the conclusion that human supplicants would have little responsibility (if any) for the result of answered petitionary prayer, and criticize their defense of the claim that God would have good reasons for creating an institution of petitionary prayer.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Aquinas and Gregory the Great on the Puzzle of Petitionary Prayer#739982
- Petitionary Prayer: A Philosophical Investigation#114001
- Are You There, God? It’s Me, the Theist: On the Viability and Virtue of Non-Doxastic Prayer#103044
- Understanding the Lord’s Prayer#760168
- On God’s Eternal Knowledge and the Problem of the Efficacy of Petitionary Prayers#715865
Record · ID 717451
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive