Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Do Current Ameliorative Accounts of Gender Adequately Consider the Gender Experiences of All People?

Harish, Nanda · 2023
PhilArchive · Papers · 2023
Open Source ↗
philosophy
This paper argues that contemporary ameliorative accounts do not adequately consider the gender experiences of all people. To do so, it sets three desiderata for an adequate account of gender: (i) that it must consider valid the identities of and enable one to explain the experiences of all cis and trans individuals, (ii) that it must be (at least in part) social positionist, and (iii) that it must be as identity-based as it is based in social position. It demonstrates that current ameliorative efforts – the ones carried out by Haslanger (2012a) and Jenkins (2016; 2018) – have been unsuccessful in meeting the three desiderata. Lastly, it attempts to describe an account of gender that can possibly satisfy all three desiderata set by the paper, drawing from Barnes (2020) and Bettcher (2007).
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 717812
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive