PhilArchive
open access
The Divine Nothing Theory
Nothing, defined as the absence of time, space, and matter, is often attributed to the creation of the universe. Theists ridicule the concept, and atheists say it is plausible. If nothing lacks time, space, and matter, I would propose that it could have non‑physical attributes such as love, intelligence, creativity, etc. The rebuttal to this would be that, in order to obtain these attributes and have them effectively, there must be something it can love or create. Thus, creation: nothing is God, and God is the absence of time, space, and matter. If nothing is attributed to creation, then an intelligent nothing is more plausible than a blank nothing.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why There Cannot Be Nothing#97638
- Why Nothingness is Nowhere to be Found: The Structure-Base Principle (SBP)#167339
- The Infinity from Nothing paradox and the Immovable Object meets the Irresistible Force#767442
- Created and Uncreated Things#758905
- The Philosophy of Superdeterminism on the Logos#80007
Record · ID 718287
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive